When the video appeared, I didn’t panic. I paid attention.
There was no need for alarm because I’ve learned to treat these moments not as surprises, but as opportunities for documentation. From the moment it was posted, I watched it the way someone watches evidence — slowly, carefully, frame by frame.
It was never just a video. It was a performance, carefully curated to provoke response, not reflection. There was an unmistakable confidence in its delivery — a belief that what was being said would land with impact, and more importantly, that there would be no meaningful consequences. That belief was misplaced.
What stood out to me most wasn’t the content itself — though it was damaging — but the way it was constructed. Every pause, every phrasing choice, every clipped detail told a story not just about me, but about the person posting it. It was edited to leave out context. It was shaped to control perception. And it was aimed directly at my reputation with surgical calculation.
But what it really revealed was motive.
It wasn’t an attempt to inform. It wasn’t accountability. It was retaliation disguised as commentary.
There are moments in the video that speak louder than the words. The shift in tone. The way my name was used. The knowing glances. The weaponisation of performance. This wasn’t a mistake. It was intent made visible.
And now that the video is gone — removed, likely by the platform itself — those intentions speak louder still.
The takedown tells me what I already knew: that even the systems which often overlook harm understood, in this case, that the content crossed a line. But it doesn’t erase what was done. The post may be gone, but the impact lingers, and the record remains intact.
I captured the video before it disappeared. I’ve archived the words, the cadence, the interaction, and the fallout. This is not paranoia — this is procedure. I don’t rely on memory anymore. I rely on proof.
Playback is not a reaction. It’s a reconstruction. And in this entry, I am not defending myself. I am documenting exactly how a false narrative was delivered with confidence, then quietly erased when it was no longer safe to keep online.
They published it.
The platform removed it.
I recorded everything in between.
Every frame of that video has now been repurposed — not for content, but for consequence.
— Calvin-Lee Hardie
Inverness